SOX Readiness
Internal Controls Built
for Public Company Standards
ICFR Framework Design
We build COSO-based internal control frameworks calibrated to your company's size and complexity -- effective for your auditors without being unnecessarily burdensome.
SOX 404 Compliance
Hands-on support for management's annual ICFR assessment, control testing, deficiency evaluation, and material weakness remediation.
Pre-IPO and Public Company Ready
Whether you are building controls for the first time before going public or managing an ongoing SOX compliance cycle, we provide the right level of support.
100+
Successful transactions completed
20+
Years of experience
$5 - 50m
Average size of transaction
$20-200m
Average market cap of clients across tech, manufacturing & services
SOX Compliance and ICFR Readiness for Public and Pre-Public Companies
What makes us different?
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance is one of the most demanding ongoing requirements for public companies. Management must evaluate and certify the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting each year, and any identified weakness — particularly a material weakness — carries significant consequences with regulators, auditors, and investors. Getting the control environment right from the start is far less costly than remediating problems after the fact.
Corviniti helps companies build, document, and assess their ICFR frameworks with the rigor that SOX requires and the practicality that management teams actually need. We work with companies at two distinct points — pre-IPO companies building their control environment for the first time, and established public companies managing ongoing SOX 404 compliance, control testing, or material weakness remediation.
Our team understands what external auditors look for when they assess ICFR, and we design control frameworks that support both operational efficiency and regulatory compliance. We focus on controls that are fit for your company’s size and complexity — neither underbuilt for a public company environment nor so burdensome that they create unnecessary friction.
We help with:
- ICFR Gap Analysis: Assess your current control environment against public company expectations and identify areas where controls are missing, poorly designed, or not operating effectively.
- Control Framework Design: Build a COSO-based internal control framework appropriate for your company’s size, structure, and risk profile.
- Process Documentation: Document financial reporting processes, identify key risks, and map controls to those risks in a format your external auditors can test.
- Risk and Control Matrices (RCMs): Prepare detailed risk and control matrices for each significant financial reporting process, including control descriptions, frequency, and evidence requirements.
- SOX 404 Readiness: Prepare management’s assessment of ICFR in advance of the annual SOX 404 evaluation, including testing support and deficiency assessment.
- Control Testing Support: Design and execute control testing procedures, document results, and assess the severity of any identified deficiencies.
- Material Weakness Remediation: Analyze identified material weaknesses, design and implement remediation plans, and document the steps taken to address the deficiency for auditors and the audit committee.
- IT General Controls (ITGCs): Assess and document IT general controls relevant to financial reporting, including access controls, change management, and computer operations.
- Disclosure Controls and Procedures (DC&P): Support management’s evaluation of disclosure controls and help establish the processes needed to support reliable, timely SEC filings.
- Ongoing SOX Support: Provide continuous or periodic ICFR support for public companies managing annual compliance cycles, control changes, or system implementations.
Why Choose Us?
Big 4 expertise,
boutique agility
Corviniti brings Big 4 audit and internal controls experience to SOX and ICFR engagements, combined with the practical focus of a boutique that understands what is appropriate for your company’s stage. We build control frameworks that work — for your operations and for your auditors.
Startups and US Capital Markets are our focus
From pre-IPO companies building their control environment for the first time to established public companies managing ongoing SOX compliance, Corviniti provides ICFR support calibrated to where you are in your public company journey.
- Pre-IPO and Newly Public Companies
- Built for Capital Markets (including IPO and SPAC transactions)
- Boutique Attention
- Big Four Experience
- Transaction Deadline Oriented
Contact Us To
Learn More
Call: (347) 472-1115
Email: info@corviniti.com
Tell us where you are in your SOX readiness process and what your timeline looks like. We will respond within 24 hours.
Learn More From
Frequently Asked Questions
Section 404(a) requires management to assess and report on the effectiveness of ICFR in the company’s annual report (Form 10-K). This requirement applies to all public companies. Section 404(b), which requires the external auditor to attest to management’s assessment, applies to accelerated filers and large accelerated filers. Newly public companies typically have a grace period before 404(b) applies, but management’s 404(a) obligation begins with the first annual report.
A control deficiency exists when a control is missing or not operating as designed. A significant deficiency is more serious and merits attention from those responsible for financial oversight, but does not rise to the level of a material weakness. A material weakness creates a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses must be disclosed and typically trigger significant scrutiny from auditors, investors, and regulators.
Ideally 12 to 18 months before your target public date. Building a control environment from scratch takes time — you need to document processes, design controls, test them, identify gaps, and remediate issues before your external auditors begin their ICFR assessment. Starting early also gives you time to make controls genuinely operational rather than just documented on paper.
The first step is a clear-eyed analysis of the root cause — whether it is a gap in control design, an operating failure, a staffing or competency issue, or a combination. From there, we help design and implement a remediation plan, document the steps taken, and prepare the disclosure language. We also support re-testing once remediation is in place to demonstrate to your auditors that the weakness has been addressed.
We design control frameworks that are proportionate to the company’s size and complexity. Many smaller public companies can maintain an effective ICFR environment with a focused, well-designed set of controls rather than an extensive internal audit department. We help identify the controls that matter most for your financial reporting risks and build a lean, effective framework around those.
Yes. We work alongside your team to prepare the documentation, testing evidence, and control descriptions your auditors need to complete their assessment. Having well-organized, auditor-ready ICFR documentation significantly reduces the time and cost of the external audit.
ERP implementations are a common trigger for ICFR issues. Changing systems affects IT general controls, access controls, and the data flows underlying financial reporting. We help assess the ICFR implications of your system change, identify the controls that need to be updated or retested, and ensure the transition does not create gaps in your control environment.
Yes. We regularly work with foreign private issuers and companies with cross-border structures, including IFRS reporting, US GAAP reconciliations, and multi-entity consolidations for companies with domestic and international subsidiaries.
In most cases, we can begin within a few days of finalizing our agreement. Our onboarding process is straightforward — a brief discovery session, a clear statement of work, and secure access setup. We do not have lengthy intake procedures that delay the start of actual work.